Achieving that would be quite a feat, but even so won't make us stand out from the crowd.
#Babeledit free alternative plus
OldakQuill 11:36, (UTC) I would guess that we would need to run a couple dozen news stories per day of interest to an international audience, plus increase the average length of the stories from our current 2-3 paragraphs to more like 6-12 paragraphs. All of these will help inform us what we are missing and how we need to improve to compete. Also, the number of stories in a particular field (Sci/Tech, Politics, etc.) could be tallied. That user then compiles an article count every day including average word count of articles. A particular outlet such as the BBC, could be assigned to a single user for a week. How about we conduct a survey of major online news outlets to realise what we are up against to be considered a viable source. What about under Sources, having a spot for Comment? With links in the same format to good blog posts, particularly those that link directly to a Wikinews story? People could then be encouraged to put comment on their blogs and add the post to the Wiki story? ClareWhite 14:22, (UTC) News outlet survey It's not like it would do any harm, but it would distract from the focus of Wikinews as well as the emphasis on neutrality. Opinions are being blogged everywhere and people come to Wikinews for news, not opinion. TalkHard 06:32, (UTC) I think that would be a good dea for the diffrent tabs, because it would be nice to be able to post comments that are not dealing with how the article is written but just comments on the content itself.- Ryan524 14:49, (UTC) I don't see how it would add anything to Wikinews. In fact, with lots of blogs ( Slashdot for example), many people only read and post opinions about an article without reading the article itelf (just the summary) - this shows how popular this feature is. You cannot contribute your opinions about an article as a reader. Currently you can only contibute as an editor. TalkHard 06:32, (UTC) What I'm suggesting is not at all a blog, although most blogs do have this feature (with good reason). That way, I presume it would still be possible (if we wanted) to use it like a template and put the comments on the article page, and would be able to lock the article without locking the comments page. IlyaHaykinson 02:07, (UTC) Is it currently possible to do this? If so, it probably would be better to set it up this way. the Talk: namespace) and one for "reader discussion", something like a Comments: namespace.
BryceHarrington 23:00, (UTC) I am in favor of having three tabs: one for the article, one for "editor discussion" (i.e. I think I have to agree with DouglasGreen on this one. TalkHard 08:23, (UTC) Er, can't readers participate and add something by just clicking edit? With a wiki, having a blog appended to each page as well seems a bit gratuitous. It's ridiculous that a site like this doesn't allow readers to participate this way. A way for the readers to participate and add something. I'm talking about comments and opinions and discussion on the finished article.
DouglasGreen 03:34, (UTC) The discussion page is for editors working out the article, and is not of much interest once the article is complete. We are unlike other news organizations in that users can already comment all they want to, in fact they can help shape the articles. It often represents an evolving opinion and argument, whereas the article represents a finished product. TalkHard 04:04, (UTC) I personally think the discussion page is better suited for this. All that would be needed is a section on the bottom of each article called "User Comments". The discussion pages would not work for this because they are on a separate page, and are used for other discussion. I'm not sure if this has been discussed, but one thing that is sorely missing from Wikinews is the ability to post comments and opinions on the stories.
0 kommentar(er)
